Since the past ongoing years, various applications have been changing our lives continually. Many experts said that mobile app development is rapidly growing industry and also it will continue the growth in future as well. Everyday people look for mobile apps for each case, for instance, order food, online shopping, hotel booking etc. Many companies are dependent on mobile apps for serving their users. Nowadays, organizations choose native applications because they effectively combine with the entire ecosystem. Let’s see, why you should go for native mobile app development.
These apps are written in languages specific for the platform. For Android, native applications are developed using Kotlin or Java. Native iOS applications are developed using Swift or Objective-C. These kind of applications are completely customized for taking advantage of the platform and offering users a great experience. Both Google and Apple offer application developers their SDK, interface components, and great development tools. Most of the companies will put resources into native application development because of more advantages provided as compared to other types of applications like Web or Hybrid. Since mobile applications are more necessary for organizations, they should know the upsides and downsides before choosing an application development platform.
Native application development might be a great choice for you if you need to offer users a better experience for feel and appearance of your application. Why? The reason is simple- when an application completely follows the directions for famous platforms, users can easily get the way of using it. There are some other reasons to use this platform for application development.
Already tech leaders like Facebook and LinkedIn had put resources into HTML5. From that point onward, they regretted their choice due to the high popularity of independent native applications.
Native applications are increasingly responsive, rapid, and offer a more noteworthy user experience. These applications work faster since they are written in languages specific to the ecosystem of the platform. Since these applications can access to unique elements and APIs that are upgraded for different devices, they run effectively and flawlessly. Opposite to that, hybrid applications depend on native applications like Android WebView or UIWebView. Because of dependence, they are not fast like native applications.
Going native is the best alternative if there is no connectivity. Organizers, coordinators, navigators and even games can perform offline as their content has been already downloaded. The in-browser caching is supported in HTML5 however you are still not free like using a native application.
Most of the hybrid applications depend just on system browser security. Cross platform and native applications are secured by different layers of an OS, which makes them difficult to misuse. Also, they don’t depend on any third-party system, using simply official APIs that have been altogether examined across various system versions. It is possible to reduce every growing security problem because of the long building of official platform SDKs. At last, official platform launches occur at less number of times as compared to framework launches. With long launch cycles, you can see dependable, appropriately analyzed, and increasingly secure software. Due to insufficient time, shorter launch cycles can be less thoroughly ready with the decision of getting solved later.
Native app’s maintenance is a somewhat complex as contrary to the hybrid app’s maintenance. Because the recent version of the app should be launched. In any case, users can get information about the latest update easily. Also, local applications upload more content on installation. Consequently, your game or messenger doesn’t require being updated frequently, dissimilar to the mobile shop or magazine which should be hybrid applications. Thus, everything depends on the application type.
For a native platform, UI or UX will be unified and appropriately learned by the users. On this platform, the complete broader UI will be standard in the native applications.
Hence there will be a shortened learning curve to grasp and people will understand the navigation in your application. User experience is better because of better performance.
Developing native applications is easy for designers, developers to apply the best standards and practices. Due to these reasons, native applications give better user experience and UI as compared to hybrid applications.
5. Less errors-
It is not easy to maintain two individual applications in one codebase. Using native app development, you have less dependence for bugs to occur because you will not depend on cross-platform tool like Xamarin. Hybrid applications can access hardware through a bridge that occasionally slows application building down and this can irritate user. This issue is seen when new iOS and Android versions are launched.
Native application developers can access new SDK to start app development with latest features. Because of this lead time, native application users can access new platform features after updating their OS.
6. Access to Complete Device Features-
Native applications are built for particular platform, taking advantages of the features of the OS and the software. These applications can precisely access the device hardware like microphone, camera, GPS, and so on, hence they are haster in the application, which offers better UX.
Another huge advantage of choosing native mobile application development is push messages which experience the APNS (iOS server) that you require your application group ID and similar with GCM (Google’s Cloud Messaging).
Native applications can be designed rapidly because they should be compatible with a single platform. There are two native assignments, they are unique. Hence, you don’t need to worry regarding the compatibility of application dependence between versions for different platforms (iOS, Android) and you are allowed to use each new feature on a given platform.
With some limitations, it gets simpler to scale. However, in case you wish to combine the benefits of both native and cross-platform solutions, you may need to start natively and afterward maximize some smaller application modules with additional cross-platform code. This is a safe technique used by a some of tech giants, for example, Airbnb and Facebook.
As iOS and Android are leader of their particular organizations, they will always help and improve the whole platform for users and the application developers.
Since these stages help native applications, they will be increasingly stable for use, support, and application development. Users will experience some crashes and glitches and the application will work flawlessly. Conversely, third-party organizations develop cross-platform frameworks. If they can’t acquire sufficient benefit from such frameworks, they may either quit supporting it absolutely or slow down the framework building.
A native application consistently pays your way. This is conceivably the most important thing for a developer, entrepreneur or both at once.
According to the previously mentioned points, it tends to be presumed that a native application will be somewhat costlier than a hybrid one; that you have a restricted budget and you would be better to spend it on promoting.
Surely, the primary kind will cost you more. You may realize that native applications offer great user experience. Since these applications need more effort and time to be built, they are suggested to be paid while hybrid applications are launched to be free. Basically, you can make a profit from your amazing native application.
Do you want to develop an app that features reliability and higher stability? Then you should go with native app development. Your choice of selecting a hybrid or native framework depends on the use cases and the type of applications you will provide. If you are not prioritizing the whole user experience and need to get something to market inexpensive and fast, a hybrid application is the best approach.